Introduction to Kripke
نویسنده
چکیده
Kripke’s professional career began as a high school student when he published his early pioneering work in logic on the semantics and completeness proofs of the normal and non-normal modal systems. Not much later, his seminal work on “Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic” appeared. Shortly after that came his founding of transfinite recursion theory with his two classic papers, “Transfinite Recursions on Admissible Ordinals” and “Admissible Ordinals and the Analytic Hierarchy.” Had he accomplished nothing else in his intellectual life, Kripke would have already earned his claim to fame. But his thoughts in what turned out to be his greatest area of accomplishment, philosophy, were just beginning to gel. Already as a college student he had the basic ideas of his classic seminal work, Naming and Necessity, which was to revolutionize the field of philosophy. The work revealed what has become a hallmark of Kripke: his conceptual clarity par excellence. While continuing to develop his ideas in mathematical logic, he developed many important thoughts in philosophy. His work on a new theory of truth for dealing with the Epimenides paradox (the semantical paradox of the liar), on a puzzle about belief, and on his novel interpretation of Wittgenstein on rules and private language have dominated discussion and generated an industry on these topics. Today, Kripke’s accomplishments span several areas of philosophy, including epistemology; metaphysics; and philosophy of language, logic, mathematics, and mind; as well as areas of mathematical logic and more recently of linguistics as well. His work has also extended to important scholarship in the history of twentieth-century philosophy and in the history of logic and set theory. In his first seminal work in philosophy, Naming and Necessity, Kripke discusses his historical predecessors, Mill, Frege, and Russell, and Introduction to Kripke
منابع مشابه
Refinement of Kripke Models for Dynamics
ions of the Muddy Children for n = 3 children. f (1) = f (2) = A, f (3) = 3 and g = Id . D3 /// means proposition D3 has valuation ? in the current state. Francien Dechesne, Yanjing Wang and Simona Orzan Refinement of Kripke Models for Dynamics Introduction Abstraction/Refinement and Logical Characterization An Example Conclusions Muddy Children Abstraction of n=3 case D1D2D3 /// D1D3 /// 3 A D...
متن کاملΕ-calculus Based Axiom Systems for Some Propositional Modal Logics
1 Introduction: Instead of considering propositional S4 (say) as a theory built on top of classical propositional logic, we can consider it as the classical first order theory of its Kripke models. This first order theory can be formulated in any of the ways first order theories usually are: tableau, Gentzen system, natural deduction, conventional axiom system, ε-calculus. If the first order th...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملUnravelling the enigmatic origin of calcitic nanofibres
Introduction Conclusions References
متن کاملAdding modal operators to the action language A
The action language A is a simple high-level language for describing transition systems. In this paper, we extend the action language A by allowing a unary modal operator in the underlying propositional logic. The extended language requires very little new machinery, and it is suitable for describing transitions between Kripke structures. We consider some formal restrictions on action descripti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011